Hindu Gods and Goddesses

Saturday, February 14, 2026

"The True Identity of Jesus Revealed: Avatar of Aadhi Maha Shasta, the Protector of Created Beings" Chapter 4 from To Be or Not to Be ... brahman or Abrahman / The World Turned Upside-Down

 

The True Identity of Jesus Revealed:

Avatar of Aadhi Maha Shasta, the Protector of Created Beings

 

Shiva, Mohini (Vishnu as a Woman) and Aadhi Maha Shasta as an infant (public domain)[i]

 

 

As this is at least the second most important issue I have determined to address in this treatise, I decided I ought pen (er, type) a more complete and pleasantly penned composition than my previous published writings addressing this issue, detailing why I have become convinced of such a paradigm shattering theory.  So here I present to you seekers of truth a more detailed telling of why I have come to believe that Jesus Christ, more properly known as Jeshua ben Joseph, was in fact an Avatar (embodiment of the Divine) of Deva (God) Shasta, also anciently known as Ayyanar or Ayyappanar, as Lakshmanapranadata, Cattan, Ayyappa, Manikandan, Karuppan, Veeran, Kathavarayan and by other names/Avatars, some likely not recorded in any scripture nor any extant myth, anciently born as the Son of Mahadeva (Great God) Shiva and Deva Vishnu as Mohini (Female Form of Vishnu) after the “churning of the sea of milk,” according to the Brahmanda Purana, and is referred to in the Puranas as anciently teaching “a galaxy of gods.”[ii]     

            Though I do intend to back up this rather astounding assertion, that Jesus who is called Christ was an incarnation of Aadhi Maha Shasta, very anciently synonymous to Buddha and known in south India as Ayyanar or Ayyanappan and later, according to academy accepted datings of the extant evidences, writ and inscribed, as Ayyappa or Manikandan, the Son of God Shiva and Goddess Mohini (God Vishnu when He was temporarily a She), with a fair amount of academy-acceptable evidence utilizing the tools offered by the disciplines of history and anthropology and religious studies, the claim that someone's soul reincarnated as another particular individual cannot, at least with the current tools and technologies proffered by the sciences, be other than a “faith” proposition.  Though in the previous chapter I approached the issue at hand with only the weight of solid evidences that fit within the bounds of the academy-approved methods of the study of religion, history, anthropology and critical theory, obviously I must take a somewhat different tack in this chapter, as I am claiming more than similarities of words, names or mythemes and correlations of well enough dated events or other well-documented facts and analogous artifacts. 

I am supposing a transmigrational reality in this portion of this work, something that must be acknowledged as speculation into “the mystical,” and not as an inquiry strictly suited to the social sciences nor to the hard sciences at this juncture, as with current methods and technologies one cannot determine aught of the paths of disembodied souls, alas.  Though there are many historically veritable evidences indicating that Jesus did venture to the lands where Vishnu and Shiva were worshipped, and where Ayyanar, also known as Cattan and Aadhi Maha Shasta was almost certainly known, and where Shasta was very anciently considered synonymous with Buddha (4th century BCE),[iii] both before and after His ministry in Palestine, and indeed many analogies and odd coincidences between the respective mythologies of Jesus and Shasta, to suppose two separate mythical/historical individuals to be the same soul reincarnated cannot be other than a statement of “religious faith.”  That acknowledged, the following are some of the evidences, both academically acceptable (if in some cases controversial) and well enough documented historical evidences, likenesses and analogous mythemes as well as experiential/“spiritual” clues or revelations granted that have convinced me that Jeshua ben Joseph, aka “Jesus Christ,” was an incarnation of Aadhi Maha Shasta/Ayyanar, also known as Ayyappa and Manikandan, and as Hari-Hara Putra or Hari-Hara Tanaya (putra and tanaya both mean “son of”), the Only Begotten Son of God Hari-Hara, God Vishnu and God Shiva, anciently born to Shiva and Mohini (Vishnu as a fertile Transsexual, Mohini means “Goddess Enchantress”) after the “churning of the Sea of Milk,” according to Hindu mythology.

            It has been well enough noted and touted that there are many uncanny similarities between the Persons of Krishna and Christ.  A Quaker named Kersey Graves (1813-1883) compiled a list of some 346 elements in common between Krishna's story and Christ's story.[iv]  Indeed, none can reasonably deny that some of the analogies are quite convincing, not the least of which is the phonetic similarity of the names, as analogous names can indicate either an historical connection else at least an esoteric resonance.  Nonetheless, to me something never seemed quite right with that attempt to identify those two purported Godmen as the same Person.  Though I believed that these connections were not without merit in some guise or other, I somehow similarly had a sense they were NOT the same Dude.  For one, Krishna is not the “Son of God,” as according to Hinduism He is God Himself—or in the case of Mohini, Herself.

            Only fairly recently in my own spiritual pilgrimage did I come across accounts of the Deva known as Ayyanar, Aadhi Maha Shasta, Lakshmanapranadata and Ayyappa, among other appellations, the Son of Shiva and Krishna/Vishnu as Mohini when Vishnu did manifest as a Goddess.  Shasta is the Only Begotten Son of God the Destroyer and God the Maintainer when the latter was a fertile transsexual!  Almost immediately something in my intuition else rational faculties told me that Shasta, the Protector of Created Beings, more anciently known (according to the extant historical and archaeological evidences) as Shasta or Ayyanar or Catan, recorded on a “hero stone” in Tamil Nadu with the inscription, "Ayyanappan; a shrine to Cattan" (3rd Century CE), was a very likely candidate for the abiding identity of the person/Person called Jeshua ben Joseph, aka Jesus Christ.  I believe that the Divine does take form amongst many ifn’t most ifn’t all peoples, that “They are among us” is true, oft enough born as our children, as “human,” and that often enough veritable Avatars of the ancient Devas and Devis, Gods and Goddesses, go scarce noticed as they complete their dharma among whatever people in whatever part of the world, as these Avatars and other celestial beings do their part in the “keeping things together,” as do so many lesser touted players living lives of whatever fame or obscurity as they do their dharma, too.  The beliefs of the Celts and other European “pagans” included the understanding that the gods sometimes take birth among the people, as the Hindus believe of “Avatars.”

            At a regional Rainbow Gathering[v] (a rendezvous of hippies in the forest) in Colorado in September of 2001, I was having a conversation with some random hippies in the meadow about Hinduism and Christianity, and one of those tie-dye clad kids randomly claimed that Jesus was the Son of Shiva and Vishnu.  I immediately objected, noting that Shiva and Vishnu are both Male.  I then asked said hippy in the meadow where he had heard the idea that he had posited, to which he replied, “You told us.”  I was rather puzzled by his response, but assumed dude was just trippin'.  Shortly thereafter we received word from “Babylon” that the World Trade Center Towers had been destroyed.  A kid in cut-off denim overalls came bounding up the hill from towards the parking area yelling as he was running and skipping through the forest towards Main Meadow, “They blew up the Towers!!  They blew up the Two Towers!!”

            A couple of years later I was visiting Mount Shasta in California with Meghan, a girlfriend who I met at a party at a polyamorous intentional community in Santa Fe, New Mexico called “The Island,” and who had been traveling with me in “The Beast Mama,” my 4-wheel drive truck with camper atop and dreamy-eyed orange sunshine face painted on the passenger door, since shortly thereafter.  We were talking about the purported sacredness of the grand mountain filling the horizon to the east and Meghan exclaimed, “It's Jesus Mountain.”  I asked her where she had heard such, as Meghan was not a Christian and was more into theories about Nibiru and the Anunnaki from Sumerian mythology than any conventional religious stuff.  Like the hippy kid at the Rainbow Gathering, Meghan claimed I had given her said information, though I could not imagine when or why I would have made such a claim, and for whatever reason I did not pursue the question to ask her when or how it was I had said such a thing.  Meghan was rather into “dream work,” so I suppose I may have conveyed that information to her in a dream, i.e., that Jesus and Shasta are the same Dude, else perhaps by some other occulted means.

Considering the significant place positings about Jesus and Aadhi Maha Shasta, born as the Son of Shiva and Vishnu as Mohini, have become since those days, since I discovered that Shiva and Vishnu did indeed have a Son together when Vishnu was temporarily a Female, I have to wonder how such seeming prescient(?) information came to said hippy in the meadow and to my erstwhile girlfriend Meghan.  Regardless, these strange synchronicities have only further convinced me that I am correct in my assessment of who Jesus who is called Christ really was:  the “Only Begotten Son” of God Shiva and God Vishnu (as Mohini), the only Son of Deva Hari-Hara, Hari-Hara Putra (putra mean “son of” the preceding name), Aadhi Maha Shasta.  The Sanskrit name or term Shasta means “the one who rules or preaches.”

 

Shasta (IAST Śāstā) is a Hindu deity, venerated with Shiva and Vishnu. Shasta is a generic Sanskrit term for a ruler, i.e. the one who rules/preaches . . . He is identified with many deities like Aiyanar, Ayyappa and Revantha. He is also called as Brahma Shastha, preacher of Pranav am.[vi]

 

 

Jesus’s name to the Muslims, and according to the purported Hindu and Buddhist accounts of His visits to India and the Himalayas, is/was “Isa.”  In Sanskrit Isa means “Lord,” among other similar derivations, and is almost certainly the original linguistic root of the Hebrew “Jeshua,” as well as to the Arabic Isa, as Jesus is called “Isa” by Muslims to this day.

 

Sanskrit           Īśa (ईश). —a. [īś-ka]  1) Owning, possessing, sharing, master or lord of; see below.  2) One who is completely master of anything.  3) Capable of (with gen.) 4) Powerful, supreme.  -śaḥ 1 A lord, master … 2) A husband. 3) A Rudra. 4) The number 11 (derived from the eleven Rudras). 5) Name of Śiva … 6) The Supreme god (parameśvara … -śā 1 Supremacy, power, dominion, greatness … 2) A servant of Śiva.[vii]

 

 

Consider as you continue, especially if you are reading this from a Christian perspective, Jesus is touted to have said to his/His disciples, “I have sheep in other pastures.”  Indeed, Shasta/Ayyappa/Ayyanar is one of the most popular Devas in many parts of India and other Hindu lands, and as Shasta has been noted since before the time of Christ, according to the Ramayana’s account of Lord Rama’s meeting Shasta, and by my reckoning is almost certainly namesake to Mount Shasta and the Shasta Indians of California.  According to the written records Shasta was known as early as when Buddhism entered South India in the 3rd century BCE, as Ayyanar not unlikely for thousands of years amongst the South Indian peoples,[viii] and as Shasta in the Ramayana, many thousands of years BCE, despite “Western” scholarship claiming a later date for the inception of said deity as they often do with Hindu Gods and scriptures and sources generally. 

 

As per Ramayana, during the time of Lord Rama’s exile, he went to the present place of Sabari Mala, and there he met Mata Sabari, who had offered fruits as food items to Rama. After some time, when Rama was passing through the Sabari Mala forest, there he saw a divine person doing meditation. On seeing him, Lord Rama had enquired. The divine person had said that he is Shasta, and then, both of them were discussed about spiritual matters, and after some time, Lord Rama had left that place.[ix]

 

 

The Makaravilakku celebration is an annual event that draws a half-million devotees of Shasta/Ayyappa to Sabarimala, Kerala, India to commemorate the meeting of Lord Rama with Shasta.[x]  Also of note in this telling from the Ramayana, an account that unequivocally predates Christianity and even Judaism, the ashram Rama visited was the ashram of Mata Sabari, a female guru, ignoring all the other ashrams in the area.  Even anciently in Hinduism, women held a revered and sacred place, with some saintly women serving as Gurus to many even in very ancient India.  I might also note, Manikandan, an Avatar of Aadhi Maha Shasta who lived about a thousand years ago, had a close friend who was a Muslim named Vavar.  The Vavar Mosque is part of the Hindu pilgrimage circuit to Sabarimala, whereupon the Hindu pilgrims circumambulate the Vavar Mosque, even whilst Muslims are praying in the mosque.  This is very analogous to Jesus/Isa being revered by Muslims, if not as an Avatar but as a Prophet.

 

Manikandan, an incarnation of Lord Ayyappa, rediscovered the temple in the 12th century. Manikandan was a prince of the Pandalam dynasty. He was found by the king on the bank of a river.

 

Just because there are not physical evidences of devotion to a Deva or Devi previous to the given academy-acknowledged textual or iconographic reference does not mean that an oral tradition of hymns and mantra and puja (ritual devotion) did not precede the written evidence thereof, perhaps by thousands of years, nor does such mean that said Being didn’t exist previous to or otherwise outside of the extant historical records.  Even Max Muller, who lambasted Hinduism generally and posited a very recent date for the advent of the Vedas early in his career, very much in line with the Abrahamic program’s attempt to discredit a “rival religion,” late in his life praised the Vedas whether they were relatively recent in origin or many thousands of years ancient.

 

Scholarly understanding of Hinduism as a systematic religion is likewise shaped by endeavors to construct a uniform, coherent system of beliefs and religious practices. However, the Hinduism of the scriptures is different from the vernacular forms of the religion that are expressed, practiced, and narrated by ordinary people, the majority of whom live in the countryside.[xi]

 

Assuming that Avatars do sometimes live among the people of this world, and not necessarily living lives of particular renown and perhaps not even known by “their own people” as Divine or particularly special, it should not be especially surprising that Jesus “had sheep in other pastures” and lived lives and accomplished feats that were recorded by other peoples.  It would also stand to reason that said Person would be at least somewhere acknowledged by the most ancient and abiding religious tradition in the world, i.e., “Hinduism," or more properly “sanAtana dharma.” 

It is more than noteworthy that some Christians have posited that Jesus may have been a reincarnation of the prophet Elisha, as Jesus did clearly claim that John the Baptist was a reincarnation of Elisha’s teacher Elijah, who is claimed by Hebrews as the greatest of the prophets.  Belief in reincarnation was almost certainly extant among Hebrews at the time of Christ, as such beliefs were later explicated in Kabbala (Jewish mysticism), and if Jesus spent time in India previous to His ministry in Palestine He had certainly been exposed to the concept.

 

10 The disciples asked him, “Why then do the teachers of the law say that Elijah must come first?” 11 Jesus replied, “To be sure, Elijah comes and will restore all things. 12 But I tell you, Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but have done to him everything they wished. In the same way the Son of Man is going to suffer at their hands.” 13 Then the disciples understood that he was talking to them about John the Baptist. (Matthew 17:10-13 New International Version)

 

 

As Elijah left the world after he and Elisha crossed the Jordan River, and thereupon granting a “double portion” of his spirit to Elisha at Elisha’s request, John the Baptist baptized Jesus in the Jordan River, transferring to Jesus John’s place in that lineage.[xii]  It would not be outside that sequence of probable reincarnational possibilities, then, to posit that if Jesus was a reincarnation of Elisha, that the same Person was also adored by “sheep in other pastures” as Aiyanar, Cattan and Shasta, that all these incarnations were Avatars of Aadhi Maha Shasta, anciently born as the Son of Shiva and Vishnu when Vishnu meditated on the Divine Feminine to be enabled to manifest as a (fertile) transsexual named Mohini.   Vishnu is paramatma, and thus the Soul of Atman, the “Spirit of God” abiding in everyone.  The Gospel of the Hebrews (early 2nd century, CE) touts that the “Holy Spirit” was Jesus’s “Divine Mother,” very much analogous to Mohini as the Goddess Mother who gave birth to Shasta.

To reiterate and enunciate, the New Testament record acknowledges that Jesus may well have lived other lifetimes before being Jeshua ben Joseph, as some have noted the implied reincarnation of the greatest of the Old Testament prophets, Elijah, as John the Baptist, and some have even gone so far as to posit Jesus as a reincarnation of Elijah’s disciple Elisha, who was granted a “double-portion” of Elijah’s spirit.[xiii]  Elisha, like Jesus and like Aadhi Maha Shasta as Lakshmanapranadata and as Manikandan, raised someone from the dead and healed people.  Elisha and Jesus were both touted to have evinced the siddhi (power of mind and matter) of multiplying food,[xiv] as was likewise demonstrated by Neem Karoli Baba (a purported Avatar of Hindu God Hanuman) in recent times, as mentioned in the preface.

Assuming Jesus was a reincarnation of Elisha (El-Isa, evocative of the name Jesus was purportedly called in India and Tibet during His “missing years” and by Muslims generally, Isa, Sanskrit for “Lord”), it would not be outrageous to claim that this same person/Person was an Avatar of Aadhi Maha Shasta, who as Lakshmanapranadata (“He who restored Lakshman’s life,” a name attributed to Shasta and also to Hanuman) raised Lakshman from the dead thousands of years before, as recounted in the Ramayana, then lived as Ayyappa/Manikandan, who healed His guru’s deaf and blind son by laying His hands upon him.  Indeed, the pieces fit quite well in such an understanding of who Jesus really was, an Avatar of Shasta, revered by both Hindus and Buddhists.

 

Elisha

Jesus

Shasta/Ayyanar/Ayyappa

-Elijah gave Elisha his mantle as prophet and a double portion of his spirit on the banks of the Jordan River.[xv]

-Raised Shunammite woman’s son from the dead.[xvi]

 

-Healed Naaman the Syrian from leprosy.[xvii]

-John the Baptist baptized Jesus and thus handing over his mantle to Jesus in the Jordan River.

 

-Raised Lazarus from the dead.

 

-Healed lepers and the blind.

-Was left by Shiva and Vishnu to be found by King Rajashekhara on the banks of the Pampa River.

 

 

-Raised Laksmana from the dead during the Ramayana war.

 

 

-Healed His guru’s deaf and blind son.

 

Again, this chapter is mostly meant as mystical positings and not necessarily as something might be proven according to the standards of the social sciences or the academy generally, though certain evidences considered acceptable by those disciplines of inquiry might well be employed to offer strong suggestions that these positings are more than mere fancy.  A fair number of reasonably trustworthy and well enough verified sources say that Jesus spent time learning and teaching in India, Tibet and Nepal and elsewhere during His “missing years," certainly a paradigm-altering factor if true.  Some Muslim scholars have called Jesus “the King of Travelers,”[xviii] obviously indicating they believe He visited many places not recorded in the New Testament. 

The name on a tomb in Srinagar, Kashmir, dating to the second century, “Yusa Asaph” (Yusa is the Persian pronunciation of “Isa”) is at least evocative of the name Ayyappa, indicating He had perhaps figured out His abiding identity by the time He retired to Kashmir, before finally leaving His life lived as Jeshua/Isa/Yusa Asaph, around 100 years after His crucifixion according to some tellings.  There are a set of footprints embedded in stone outside of the shrine said to belong to this teacher who came from the west that clearly show the scars of crucifixion, indicating Jesus may well have gone to India after His crucifixion and resurrection as well as during “the missing years,” and at some level tying the stories of Jeshua/Jesus/Isa/Yusa Asaph to Sastha/Ayyanappan /Manikandan and the ancient traditions of sanAtana dharma, the religion of Jesus’s ancient ancestors before Abraham.  Fida Hussnain notes that the direction of the burial of Yuza Asaph is in an east-west direction, thus indicating the person buried there was not Muslim, and was very likely Jewish.[xix] 


Carved Footprints of Yusa Asaph at the Rosebal Shrine of Srinagar, Kashmir, India, displaying the anatomically correct scars from crucifixion.  “The carved Footprints:  It has always been the custom and practice of worshippers to place candles around the tombstones. When the century-old layers of wax were removed in 1975 from an elevated stone in the inner chamber of the tomb, a sensational discovery was made: ‘A pair of footprints was carved into the stone and beside them lay a wooden crucifix and a rosary.’”[xx]

 

The Bhavishya Purana, one of the 18 Principle Upanishads (of uncertain dating), part of which is understood as a book of prophecies, purportedly contains a prophecy about Jesus coming to India.  According to Stephen Knapp, this text

 

describes the future appearance of Isha putra, the son (putra) of God (Isha)(Jesus Christ), born of an unmarried woman named Kumari (Mary) Garbha Sambhava. He would visit India at the age of thirteen and go to the Himalayan Mountains and do tapas or penance to acquire spiritual maturity under the guidance of rishis and siddha-yogis before going back to Palestine to preach to his people. So, if Jesus was trained by the sages of India, this would explain why he was able to perform various miracles (siddhas).[xxi]

 

 

            Though this is somewhat contested in terms of the antiquity of the prophecy, as European and American critics are quite loathe to accept the Hindus datings of their own scriptures, it nonetheless adds to the evidences that indicate Jesus may well have travelled to India and Tibet.  Another account in the Bhavishya Purana tells of Yuza Asaph meeting with Emperor Shalivahana (1st century CE) in the Himalayas.  It is indeed difficult to determine whether this was indeed a prophecy, i.e., was from before the time of Jesus, or was a later rendering describing an actual historical encounter, else was a fabrication as some critics have contended.  Nonetheless, this evidence, along with so many more traces, indicate a likelihood that Jesus did indeed spend time in India during His “missing years.”  Below is the passage in question from the Bhavishya Purana, from Stephen Knapp’s “Jesus Predicted in the Vedic Literature?”

 

Once upon a time the subduer of the Sakas went towards Himatunga and in the middle of the Huna country (Hunadesh – the area near Manasa Sarovara or Kailash mountain in Western Tibet), the powerful king saw an auspicious man who was living on a mountain. The man’s complexion was golden and his clothes were white.

The king asked, ‘Who are you sir?’ ‘You should know that I am Isha Putra, the Son of God’, he replied blissfully, and ‘am born of a virgin.’

‘I am the expounder of the religion of the mlecchas and I strictly adhere to the Absolute Truth.’ Hearing this the king enquired, ‘What are the religious principles according to your opinion?’

Hearing this questions of Shalivahana, Isha putra said, ‘O king, when the destruction of the truth occurred, I, Masiha the prophet, came to this country of degraded people where there are no rules and regulations. Finding that fearful irreligious condition of the barbarians spreading from Mleccha-Desha, I have taken to prophethood’.

Please hear, Oh king, which religious principles I have established among the mlecchas. The living entity is subject to good and bad contaminations. The mind should be purified by taking recourse of proper conduct and performance of japa [meditation on the chanting of the holy names of God]. By chanting the holy names one attains the highest purity. Just as the immovable sun attracts, from all directions, the elements of all living beings, the Lord of the Surya Mandala [solar planet], who is fixed and all-attractive, and attracts the hearts of all living creatures. Thus by following rules, speaking truthful words, by mental harmony and by meditation, Oh descendant of Manu, one should worship that immovable Lord’.

Having placed the eternally pure and auspicious form of the Supreme Lord in my heart, O protector of the earth planet, I preached these principles through the mlecchas’ own faith and thus my name became ‘isha-masiha’ (Jesus the Messiah).

After hearing these words and paying obeisances to that person who is worshiped by the wicked, the king humbly requested him to stay there in the dreadful land of mlecchas.”

King Shalivahana, after leaving his kingdom performed an asvamedha yajna and after ruling for sixty years, went to heaven. Now please hear what happened when the king went to (the heavenly region of) svargaloka. (Bhavishya Purana, Chaturyuga Khanda Dvitiyadhyayah 19.22-32)[xxii]

 

 

            During my undergraduate studies I was for a time a Southern Baptist preacher.  Though to many, this might not seem a good starting place for a seeker of truth, as said group is known to be rather narrowly dogmatic, it was in fact somewhat due to clues proffered by the mostly Southern Baptist professors at Oklahoma Baptist University that I began to question the dogmas of that faith and to open my mind to many ideas outside the bounds of Southern Baptist beliefs, and outside the paradigm of American society generally.  It was well-educated Christians who were in fact those who had inadvertently led me to experiment with a Bohemian lifestyle and to take a Kierkegaardian “leap of faith” into unhindered self- (and Self-) discovery. 

Years later, after I was introduced to and embraced the teachings of sanAtana dharma, I still felt that somehow Jesus was a legitimate expression of “God" and one who well enough presented and practiced the teachings of eternity (quite literally, “sanAtana dharma”).  Aadhi Maha Shasta was the Person I was eventually drawn to that seemed to present a likely connection between those first religious impulses and practices I was exposed to (other than devotion to and adoration of Nature, the mountains, wilderness and women) and the abiding truth I found so succinctly and abidingly expressed as sanAtana dharma/“Hinduism.”

            Shasta is indeed a unique Son of God, as the Christian title, “the only begotten Son of God,” does tout of Jeshua.  Vishnu (God the Maintainer, known as Krishna in His most popular form, when He makes love to 10,000 milkmaids just as each wished to be made love to, all at the same time...) this one time did manifest on earth as a Woman by meditating intensely upon Shakti, the Divine Feminine, the Goddess, in order to deal with a particular menace, a dangerous demon named Bhasmasura.  After Vishnu as Mohini had defeated Bhasmasura and returned to His normal Male form, Shiva asked Him to show Himself again as Mohini, His Female form.  Well, as Shiva is the essence of male virility, He ends up desiring the lovely and seductive Mohini—Who is actually Shiva’s Consort Parvati’s Brother under normal circumstances!  They end up hooking up and Shiva impregnated Mohini (Vishnu) with an Avatar of Aadhi Maha Shasta, the Protector of Created Beings.  This certainly seems to fulfill the “only 'begotten' Son” scenario proffered by the Christian religion, and in fact does fit rather well with the “Father, Son and Holy Spirit” trinity of Christianity, as Jesus's Divine Mother, Vishnu as Mohini, is Paramatma, the Soul of Atman, God's “Spirit” extant in all beings.  Shasta does have Divine Brothers and Sisters, though none of Them were given birth to by Vishnu, God the Maintainer, as a Divine Transsexual!

            I mean, if your Divine Mom is generally a Dude, and One who exists in everyone's heart, how might you refer to Her/Him?  As Vishnu is the paramatma, the aspect of God which dwells in everyone as Atman, God indwelling, then how would Jesus refer to this Being to people not directly exposed to the teachings of Abraham's forefathers, if not as “the Holy Spirit?”  The non-canonical Gospel of the Hebrews, which dates to as early as the Gospels that did make it into the Bible, designates the Holy Spirit as Jesus’s “Divine Mother,”[xxiii] matching quite succinctly my assertion that the “Holy Spirit” is indeed Mohini/Vishnu as paramatma.  This little clue, by the way, seems very likely to likewise help explain the rather confused misogynistic tendencies of Christians that certainly exist—despite the New Testament statement that “there is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, neither man nor woman, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” 

Likely most responsible for the misogyny promoted by the Abrahamic religions, however, is the lack of any significant mention of the Feminine Divine, conspicuously absent in all three, with the exception of the non-canonical (not included in “The Bible”) Gospel of the Hebrews, and perhaps a few other scarce and apocryphal sources, else the metaphor of God wishing to gather his children “as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings” (Luke 13:34 NIV).  I might also note, the metaphor of a hen gathering her chicks nicely corresponds to the identification of the Hebrew Yahweh with Lord Yama, as in the Vedas Lord Yama “is called a king or . . . `" the gatherer of men"', and presides over the departed fathers in heaven [the Pitṛloka/Father’s realm] . . .”[xxiv]

This theory about the true identity of Jesus Christ touches upon a very “modern” issue, with transsexual mothers/fathers being a very current topic in the global discourse of the 2020s—yet another reason I am anxious to have this book available to the public as soon as I might.  Indeed, if Jesus was an Avatar of Aadhi Maha Shasta, called Ayyappa in the Brahmanda Purana, Only Begotten Son of Shiva and Vishnu when Vishnu was a Divine Transsexual named Mohini, “the narrow path” suddenly becomes rather broader and indeed more inclusive.

Thus and to reiterate, assuming my identification of said Persons as the same Being is legitimate, Jesus's (Shasta’s) real Mom/Divine Mother (again, Mary was a surrogate mom) is generally a Fellow, a Dude Who many millions of Gopis (“milkmaids”), both female and male, religiously-sexually desire, and is the Person to whom Jesus was referring when He talked about “the Holy Spirit”—i.e., Vishnu in His role as paramatma.  Though I do not believe that Jesus was necessarily overtly aware of His true identity as Avatar of Shasta throughout the entire course of His life, I am supposing that at some level He understood the role He was playing in the Grand lila of this Age.  Again, the name He purportedly took in Kashmir after the resurrection, the name on a tomb in Srinagar that is attended to and revered to this day, is “Yusa Asaph.”  “Yusa” is the Persian rendering of “Jesus”/Jeshua/Isa (and again, Isa, Sanskrit for Lord, was the name Jesus was purportedly called during His earlier “missing years,” a name or title that is indeed the ancient linguistic root to “Jesus,” Jeshua” and “Joshua”), and “Asaph” is rather phonetically close to “Ayyappa,” and thus might indicates He had figured out who He really was by that point, and who He would be in His next incarnation.  Even if the name Jeshua took in Kashmir preceded the name Ayyappa in the historical record does not mean they were not incarnations of the same Person, as the understanding of Aadhi Maha Shasta as “The Protector of Created Beings” would indicate His presence is not limited to any particular Avatar.  There are in fact eight acknowledged primary Avatars of Shasta:

 

The Ashta-Shasta (eight Shastas) are Aadhi Maha ShastaDharma Shasta (Ayyappan), Gnana ShastaKalyana Varadha ShastaSammohana ShastaSanthana Prapti ShastaVeda Shasta and Veera Shasta.”  Aadhi Maha Shasta is the Prime form of Shasta, as adhi means “as a prefix to verbs and nouns, expresses above, over and above,”[xxv]

 

 

“Maha” means “great” (and is in fact anciently related to if not direct progenitor of the English “much” and prefix “mega-”).  Though certainly not admissible as academic evidence, the pronunciation of “Aadhi” is evocative of “A.D.” denoting the supposed birth date of Jesus, perhaps yet another esoteric clue that might hint that Jeshua was indeed an Avatar of Aadhi Maha Shasta.  It seems likely thus that Jesus came to better understand His proper role in this Grand lila, the Play of the Gauri Yuga (Golden Age) of the Kali Yuga (Dark Age), after having died and having risen from the dead.

Unlike most who tout that Jesus retired in Kashmir after having been crucified, I have no problem with a literal resurrection from the dead, by the way, for one as I've had personal experiences that indicate death is by no means unconquerable, and indeed there seem very likely many possible paths after departing a body, including returning to the same form, with or without the fatal wounds.  Consider, if reincarnation is veritable (as so many traditions do claim), this is in fact the afterlife to your past lives lived!  Welcome to eternity!! 

I might also note, there are traditions in Kashmir that claim the tomb of Moses is on a mountain in Kashmir, as several biblical place names associated with Moses’s resting place are found around Srinagar, Kashmir, where Yusa Asaph’s tomb is located.[xxvi]  So many evidences do point to sanAtana dharma as the religion of Abraham’s forefathers, and do show those religions’ stories as not so separate, “West and East,” as most suppose.  If Judaism and the Abrahamic religions generally do issue from “Hinduism,” if as critical responses, then Jesus, if a part of this more grand and more ancient story, most succinctly fits as the Person of Aadhi Maha Shasta on the grand roster, the cast list of Bigtime Players in this movie, in the Grand lila of this age.

Another Christian understanding of Jesus is that He was “the Word,” as their scripture says, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God, and the Word became flesh and dwelt among us.”  Shasta (as well as His half-brother Kartikeya) is very much associated with (AUM), the Primal sound, which is certainly the origin of the Judeo-Christian “Amen” and Muslim “Amin,” another clear resonance between Shasta and Jesus, between sanAtana dharma and Judaism, Christianity and Islam.  Yet another rather profound similarity is found in one of the most prominent stories about Shasta:  as Manikandan, it is touted that He healed a deaf and blind boy, a similar miracle to those attributed to Jesus Christ!

 

Upon completing his princely training and studies when he offered 'gurudakshina' or fee to his guru, the master aware of his divine power asked him for a blessing of sight and speech for his blind and dumb son. Manikantan placed his hand on the boy and the miracle happened.[xxvii]

 

 

            Note the “laying on of hands” of Manikandan to heal the deaf and blind boy, very like the siddhi (“supernatural power”) evinced when Jesus laid His hands on the ailing to heal them.  Raising the dead is another miracle attributed to Shasta, as His name Lakshmanapranadata, which means Reviver of Lakshmana's Life, clearly indicates.  As Lakshman was Lord Rama’s brother, and Rama lived previous to Krishna, previous to at least 3000 BCE, Aadhi Maha Shasta must have been active thousands of years before extant records tell of His incarnation as Ayyappa, and indeed well before Jeshua ben Joseph lived in Palestine.   Indeed, these many indications incline me to believe that the two mythological figures are the same Person, as they have such attributes in common.  The many touted similarities between Krishna and Christ are well explained by the aforementioned theory as well, as perhaps “the Son” Shasta was endeavoring to fill the roles of Krishna, who was the Divine Mother of Jesus as Mohini, and who also lived as the Buddha, in His/Her apparent absence.  Again, Shiva is “the Father.”

            The miracles associated with Aadhi Maha Shasta in His various incarnations are not the normative feats attributed to Devas in Hindu mythology.  Though various expressions of the Divine do on occasion heal people or revive them from the dead in the myths of Hinduism, these are exceptional cases.  That Shasta’s most touted acts are so analogous to those miracles attributed to Jesus Christ is uncanny, and strongly reifies the potential of a coidentity of these two “Sons of God."  Consider likewise the “Wise men from the East,” the “magi” that are said to have followed a star to find the baby Jesus.

 

Sanskrit           1) Maga (मग):—m. a magian, a priest of the sun, [Varāha-mihira; Bhaviṣya-purāṇa, khaṇḍa 1 & 2: bhaviṣya-purāṇa & bhaviṣyottara-purāṇa]

2) [plural] Name of a country in Śākadvīpa [one of this world’s “seven islands,” “sapta-dvipa”] inhabited chiefly by Brāhmans

Indian History and Geography

Maga or Maka: We can accurately identify the area of the Indo-Greek King Maga or Maka because the area of western Bactria, western Tajikistan, eastern Tukmenistan and eastern Uzbekistan was well-known as the country of Maka. Most probably, the first Indo-Greek King of this area had a title of Soter Megas (ΣΩΤΗΡ ΜΕΓΑΣ) which is evident from the numismatic evidence. The descendants of Indo-Greek King Soter Megas also had the same title. Therefore, they were generally referred to as Maga or Maka kings. Gradually, the country of Maga kings also came be known as Maga. Since Zoroaster was born in this Maka kingdom, Zoroastrianism also came to be known as Maghism.  

Maga.—(EI 9; BL), the same as Śākadvīpīya; a community of Brāhmaṇas; name of the members of the Persian priestly community (Magi) settled in India and absorbed in the Brāh-maṇa class.[xxviii]

Tamil              makA   1. great, high, exalted, dignified, noble, honourable; 2. immense, prodigious, stupendous, monstrous, extreme; 3. superior, paramount, superlative; 4. intense[xxix]

 

 


Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva behind Shiva’s Sons Ganesha, Shasta, and Kartikeya (public domain)[xxx]

 

 

Traditionally though not Biblically presented as three in number, the story of the “Three Wisemen” is at least evocative of the Trimurti of Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva, and possibly indicating that “the magi” were “Hindu” sages.  If these wisemen were, as is generally touted, Zoroastrian, their appearance for Jeshua’s nativity is nonetheless indicative of the “interfaith” nature of Shasta’s mission when He lived as Jeshua of Galilee.

            Indubitably a seminal consideration along this line of reasoning is the “missing years of Jesus” (age 13-28).  Many sources indicate that Jesus went away to the East to learn from the brahmins and then from the Buddhists (once He had a break with the ritualistically and caste-bound brahmins) before returning to Palestine to deliver His message to the Israelites.[xxxi]  His issues with the legalistically bound brahmins, as told in the purported ancient Buddhist accounts, are very clearly reflected in His issues with the Pharisees and Sadducees when he returned to Palestine, who were essentially the high-caste Hebrews.  According to Hindu tradition, the Buddha was the Ninth Avatar of Vishnu, so it makes sense that an Avatar of Vishnu's Son would be drawn from brahmin Hinduism and its “Pharisaical” rules to hanging out with Buddhists, who follow the teachings of Jeshua's Divine Mother when She was, as generally is, a He, as according to some Hindus Vishnu did live as the Buddha after living as A/The Black Dude (Krishna translates from Sanskrit as “black”).  To Buddhists and some Hindus, Shasta is considered, in some guise, to be the Buddha, or an emanation, expression or synonym thereof.

            Though I have decided I will not delve too deeply into the many and controversial evidences that indicate Jesus traveled to India and Tibet during His “missing years,” and that He returned to live in Kashmir after the crucifixion and was buried in a tomb in Srinagar, suffice it to say there are many ancient accounts from Sanskrit, Pali, Tibetan, Chinese, Arabic and other languages telling that Jesus did spend significant time in India and lands thereabout.[xxxii]  The Gospel of the Hebrews (early 2nd century CE) claims that Jesus traveled to Assyria and Mesopotamia on the trade routes to India, [xxxiii] as well as touting the “Holy Spirit” as Jesus’s “Divine Mother.” I will include a number of the best and most touted titles and sources available that offer these arguments and evidences of Jesus’s journeys to India in an appendix at the end of the book as well as in the footnotes and bibliography.   In the meantime, I will attempt to offer a fairly short synopsis of what these traditions of “Jesus in India” do assert. 

            According to various sources, some of which can be at least indirectly dated to around the second century CE, a teacher named Yusa Asaph who came from a faraway land was placed in a tomb in Srinagar, Kashmir, and memorialized by impressions of His footprints carved in stone which do clearly show the anatomically correct scars of crucifixion.[xxxiv]  It is also touted by many in Kashmir that Moses’s tomb is to be found there, and indeed many of the place names related to the place Moses went after departing Canaan are found in Kashmir,[xxxv] a place that has been a home to many Hebrews since long before the time of Jesus, i.e., after the second Babylonian captivity of the Jews (the “Lost Tribes of Israel”), and to many more after the Romans sacked Jerusalem.  According to numerous if obscure sources (including some, since originally made known to Europe, “disappeared” sources), Jeshua's Jain, Hindu and Buddhist teachers and disciples during His earlier missing years knew the wandering mystic as Isa, which means “Lord” in Sanskrit, and likely more than coincidentally, the latter part of His later Persian name, Yusa Asaph, is phonetically quite close to Ayyappa.[xxxvi] 

Interestingly, though I would not necessarily contend indicative of authorship, the Isa Upanishad is supposed by some scholars to have been composed sometime around the 1st century, possibly coinciding with Jesus's purported “lost years” time spent in India as “Isa.”  Indubitably, the Isa Upanishad is VERY close to the teachings of Jesus as recorded in the New Testament, likely closer than any other purportedly parallel set of teachings, save for perhaps some of the other Upanishads.  Two versions of the final verse of the Isa Upanishad, wherein (Yahva) Agni is invoked:

18   O God Agni, lead us on to prosperity by a good path, judging all our deeds. Take away ugly sin from us. We shall say many prayers unto thee. (Isa Upanishad v.18)[xxxvii]

18. Agni, lead us on to wealth (beatitude) by a good path, thou, O God, who knowest all things!  Keep far from us crooked evil, and we shall offer thee the fullest praise! (Rv. I, 189, 1.)[xxxviii] (Isa Upanishad v.18)

 

And a strikingly parallel passage from the conclusion of “The Lord’s Prayer” from the Book of Matthew:

 

“And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, forever. Amen.” (Matthew 6:13 KJV)

 

 

            The Katha Upanishad begins when the father of a boy named Nachiketa tells him to go to hell, or rather, upon questioning his father’s meager sacrifice, Nachiketa’s father says, “To Death (Yama) I give you!”  Nachiketa, being a dutiful son, goes to find Lord Yama’s abode.  When he arrives at Yama’s hermitage, Nachiketa has to wait for three nights without food or water, and so upon Yama’s return the Lord of Death and Hell offers the boy three boons.  The first two boons are readily granted by Lord Yama: that Nachiketa and his father be reconciled, and that Yama teaches Nachiketa of the fire sacrifice.  Yama is not so willing to grant the third boon, as Nachiketa asks for the secret of Death from the Lord of Death and Hell himself. 

 

20 Nachiketa said: There is this doubt about a man when he is dead: Some say that he exists; others, that he does not. This I should like to know, taught by you. This is the third of my boons.

21 Yama said: On this subject even the gods formerly had their doubts. It is not easy to

understand: the nature of Atman is subtle. Choose another boon, O Nachiketa! Do not

press me. Release me from that boon.

22 Nachiketa said: O Death, even the gods have their doubts about this subject; and you have declared it to be not easy to understand. But another teacher like you cannot be found and surely no other boon is comparable to this.

23 Yama said: Choose sons and grandsons who shall live a hundred years; choose elephants, horses, herds of cattle and gold. Choose a vast domain on earth; live here as many years as you desire.

24 If you deem any other boon equal to that, choose it; choose wealth and a long life. Be the king, O Nachiketa, of the wide earth. I will make you the enjoyer of all desires.

25 Whatever desires are difficult to satisfy in this world of mortals, choose them as you wish: these fair maidens, with their chariots and musical instruments − men cannot obtain them. I give them to you and they shall wait upon you. But do not ask me about death.

26 Nachiketa said: But, O Death, these endure only till tomorrow. Furthermore, they exhaust the vigour of all the sense organs. Even the longest life is short indeed. Keep your horses, dances and songs for yourself.

27 Wealth can never make a man happy. Moreover, since I have beheld you, I shall certainly obtain wealth; I shall also live as long as you rule. Therefore no boon will be accepted by me but the one that I have asked.

28 Who among decaying mortals here below, having approached the undecaying immortals and coming to know that his higher needs may be fulfilled by them, would exult in a life over long, after he had pondered on the pleasures arising from beauty and song?

29 Tell me, O Death, of that Great Hereafter about which a man has his doubts.

(Katha Upanishad 1.20-29)[xxxix]

 

 

            Upon listening to the previous dialogue via an audiobook version, it occurred to me how much the exchange reminded me of the story of the temptation of Christ in the wilderness.  Knowing what I now know regarding Jesus’s likely sojourn in India, it seems almost certain that Jeshua/Isa heard and not unlikely memorized this story in the original Sanskrit.  The substance of the “three temptations of Christ,” hunger, fear of death, and desire for worldly power and pleasure, are all present in the dialogue between Nachiketa and Yama.  Regarding hunger and fear of death, asking for his second boon, Nachiketa says,

 

12 In the Heavenly World there is no fear whatsoever. You, O Death, are not there and no one is afraid of old age. Leaving behind both hunger and thirst and out of the reach of sorrow, all rejoice in Heaven.[xl]

 

 

And regarding the temptation of worldly power and pleasure,

 

23 Yama said: Choose sons and grandsons who shall live a hundred years; choose elephants, horses, herds of cattle and gold. Choose a vast domain on earth; live here as many years as you desire.

24 If you deem any other boon equal to that, choose it; choose wealth and a long life. Be the king, O Nachiketa, of the wide earth. I will make you the enjoyer of all desires.

25 Whatever desires are difficult to satisfy in this world of mortals, choose them as you wish: these fair maidens, with their chariots and musical instruments − men cannot obtain them. I give them to you and they shall wait upon you. But do not ask me about death.[xli]

 

and relating to these same fears and desires, from the Book of Matthew, chapter 4 (NIV),

 

 

Hunger . . .

 

3 The tempter came to him and said, “If you are the Son of God, tell these stones to become bread.”

 

Death . . .

 

6 “If you are the Son of God,” he said, “throw yourself down. For it is written: “’He will command his angels concerning you, and they will lift you up in their hands, so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.’”

 

Desire for pleasure and power . . .

 

8 Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor. 9 “All this I will give you,” he said, “if you will bow down and worship me.”

 

The parallels between these two narratives are rather uncanny.  And thus it seems almost certain that Jesus did spend time in India, and that He indeed incorporated the tale of Nachiketa from the Katha Upanishad into His rendering of His fast/vision quest as a series of “temptations,” as the same basic fears and desires are dealt with in both narratives in pretty much the same order.  In the “temptation of Christ” version, it is “the Devil” that takes the place of Deva Yama, the Lord of Death and Hell (who was, as much noted, rendered, along with his priest and friend Yahva Agni, as “Yahweh” by the Hebrews, from the Sanskrit yahva), and Jesus’s role would correspond to Nachiketa’s in the telling in the introduction of the Katha Upanishad.  Steeped in the Upanishads when in India, as said sacred scriptures or songs were current and rather the hot thing in the religious discourse of India in the 1st century of the Common Era, Jesus certainly employed some of the metaphors and allegories He learned in India to deliver His teachings to His Jewish followers in Palestine, translated and modified to fit a Hebrew context and Hebrew mythology.  Indeed, it seems likely Jesus/Isa thus rendered whatever visions he/He experienced fasting in the wilderness in terms of that ancient story of Nachiketa meeting Lord Yama, rendered in a way that would be relevant to people with a Hebrew background.  George Wolfe similarly recognized parallels between the three temptations of Jesus and the Katha Upanishad in his treatise, and also notes parallels between the Katha Upanishad and the Jesus’s story of the prodigal son, further indicating the Katha Upanishad had very much influenced Jesus’s teachings.[xlii] 

At least a few of Jesus’s other more touted sayings are likewise very close to other verses from the Katha Upanishad.  For example, the Katha Upanishad does tout, “Abiding in the midst of ignorance, thinking themselves wise and learned, fools go aimlessly hither and thither, like blind led by the blind” (Katha Upanishad 2.5), and as Jesus put it, “He replied, 'Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be pulled up by the roots.  Leave them; they are blind guides.  If the blind lead the blind, both will fall into a pit’” (Matthew 15:13 NIV).  The Katha Upanishad warns, “Arise! Awake! Approach the great and learn. Like the sharp edge of a razor is that path, so the wise say-hard to tread and difficult to cross” (Katha Upanishad 3.14).  This metaphor is very likely referring to the “razor’s edge” paths in the high mountains, narrow ridges used as pathways across treacherous mountain terrain in the Himalayas, where one misstep on either side of the pathway may lead to a fall of a thousand feet or more.  And as Jesus phrased it, “But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it” (Matthew 7:14).  In the Bhagavad Gita Krishna acknowledges of Himself, "...I am the origin of the whole world and also its dissolution...l am the beginning, the middle, and the end of all things" (Bhagavad Gita, 7.6, Bhagavad Gita 10.20).  In the New Testament Jesus touts, "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end." (Revelation 22:13).[xliii]  George Wolfe in his Parallel Teachings in Hinduism and Christianity touts in summation,

 

This examination of scriptural writings reveals that many teachings present in canonical Christian scriptures are also found in the Upanishads. In the context of the gospels, many of these teachings represent pivotal ideas in the emergence of

Christianity from Judaism. Some of these ideas are expressed using images found in the Upanishads, several of which are noticeably absent from the Hebrew scriptures that are part of the Christian canon.[xliv]

 

 

One of the most significant parallels indicating Jesus likely had access to the teachings of Hinduism is His take on “the Holy Spirit.”  The Hebrews do have a concept of “the Spirit of God,” and even “the Holy Spirit,” Ruach Hakodesh, literally “Spirit the Holy,” but the understanding that “the Holy Spirit” is indwelling is absent in Judaism, so Jesus must have come to that understanding from some other source.  As previously noted, the Upanishads tout that Atman is the expression of brahman/purusha/the Universal Divine that abides as a flame in everyone’s heart, the “Spirit of God” present in every being’s heart.  “The thumb-sized Purusha in Hinduism symbolizes the internal self (atman) residing in the heart of beings and represents a supreme consciousness that, though small, embodies spiritual essence beyond physical limitations.”[xlv]  Thus Jesus’s “Holy Spirit” is much more like Atman than like the Hebrew Ruach Hakodesh.  Hebrew ruach means “spirit” in a general sense, not necessarily referring to “god’s spirit” nor even necessarily a good spirit, and might possibly be related to Sanskrit rohaka m. “a kind of spirit.”  

 

12 The Purusha, of the size of a thumb, dwells in the body. He is the Lord of the past and the future. After knowing Him, one does not conceal oneself any more. This, verily, is That.  13 The Purusha, of the size of a thumb, is like a flame without smoke. The Lord of the past and the future, He is the same today and tomorrow. This, verily, is That. (Katha Upanishad 2.1.12-13)[xlvi]

 

            “The Kingdom of God within” is another metaphor that is found in both the sayings of Jesus in the New Testament and also succinctly in the Upanishads.  As expounded by George Wolfe in his treatise Parallel Teachings in Hinduism and Christianity,

           

In Hinduism, Atman is the spirit dwelling within man. It is often designated by the term "Self." It is through enlightenment that Atman is realized to be Brahman.

Some Hindu sages also refer to Atman as God within. (Prabhavananda 1948:v).

In the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad it says: "now if a man depart this life without knowing the kingdom of the Self, he, because of that ignorance, does not enjoy the bliss of liberation. He dies without reaching the goal...Wherefore let him know the kingdom of the Self, and that alone" (Brihadaranyaka Upanishad).

           

"The kingdom of God is not coming with signs to be observed; nor will they say,

'Lo, here it is!' or 'There!' for behold, the Kingdom of God is within you"

(Luke 17:20, 21) [emphases added] [xlvii]

 

The similarity of these sayings and narratives from the Upanishads and the Gospels make it appear very likely that Jesus had an intimate familiarity with the Upanishads, thus providing further evidence that Jesus likely spent time in India during His “missing years.”  Many other connecting factors wait to be unraveled with this identification of Jesus as an Avatar of Shasta in mind, factors which give clue to the history and dance and pilgrimage of peoples and the play of the gods and of God and Goddess throughout history and eternity.  Again, Buddhists tout Shasta as an incarnation of the Buddha, or as an emanation, expression or synonym thereof.  And to reify that Jesus Christ was indeed and in truth an Avatar of Aadhi Maha Shasta, the appearance of a never-before-seen star is associated with His apparition:

 

Every year, millions converge upon Sabarimala irrespective of caste or creed, with garlands and irumudis, chant paeans to Lord Ayyappa, bathe in holy river Pampa, climb up the eighteen stairs, hoping to catch a glimpse of Lord Ayyappa, the Dharmasastha.
The Jewel Casket is carried on head from the ancestral residence of the royal family of Pandalam to the Shrine on the day. A Garuda, the Brahaman kite, follows this ornaments-carrying procession, hovering about in the sky, After these ornaments are worn on the Lord the bird circles the temple in the sky three times and disappears. Excited by this sight the devotees begin to chant "Swamiye Saranam Ayyappa". A Star never seen before in the sky [emphasis added] appears on the day of Makarajyothi day before the sighting of the Jyoti. A Jyoti is seen for a little time on the hilltop showing the presence of Swami Ayyappan gracing his devotees."[xlviii]

 

 

            This festival and the “never-before-seen star” portending the arrival of Dharma Shasta clearly presents the same basic mytheme as the star telling of Jesus Christ's birth.  Pilgrims on this pilgrimage are to treat everyone else on that path the same, as if they are Ayyappa Himself (Love your neighbor as your Self/Atman), irrespective of caste, displaying the same eschewal of the caste system as Jesus did when amongst the Hebrews, thus evoking the ire of the high caste Hebrews, the Pharisees and the Sadducees, just as He had angered the brahmins in Jagannath during His “missing years.”  This is also not unlike the message Jesus offered in “The Parable of the Sheep and the Goats,” wherein Jesus claims that “Whatever you do unto the least of these, you do unto me,” and “Whatever you don’t do to the least of these, you don’t do to me,” regarding helping the needy, indicating a parallel relationship to the pilgrims on the path to Sabarimala vowing to treat all the other pilgrims as if they are Lord Ayyappa Himself.  Every direction I have looked and explored, evidences and clues abound that indicate Jesus was an Avatar of Aadhi Maha Shasta, indeed at least indirectly namesake to Mount Shasta in California, as the Shasta Native American Indians were Shaivites, devotees of Shiva and Vishnu/Mohini’s Son Shasta. 

Another quite interesting Person that I just came across whilst in the final stages of preparing this chapter is Devi Mariamman, which translates as Goddess “Mother Mary.”  She is a rain Goddess and an Avatar of Parvati, Shiva's Consort.  She has the power to give or remove life threatening illnesses and is one of the three main deities at the Val-Morin Subramanya Ayyappa Mariamman Temple just north of Montreal, Quebec, Canada.  I haven't been able to find any further evidence or particular mythic accounts of Ayyappa/Shasta's connection to “Mother Mary” Mariamman beyond the facts that they share a temple in Canada and are both popular in south India, and that Mariamman is involved in removing life threatening illnesses, but the coincidences or correspondence is at least interesting.

            In regard to the idea that the Abrahamic religions are presented as if each is gazing upon one of three Faces of Trimurti, it seems that Christianity is looking at the Maintainer, Krishna, in terms of that religion's Abrahman-ic response to the anciently devised order of brahman.  Though Jesus was not, by my interpretation, an Avatar of Krishna, but was in fact an Avatar of Hari-Hara Putra, of Aadhi Maha Shasta, who was Krishna's Son when Krishna was temporarily a Goddess, Jesus seems to have very much favored Vishnu/Buddha dharma and Vedanta (i.e., the teachings of the Upanishads).  Apparently having been shunned and plotted against by the brahmins who he spent time with in Jagannath, India, largely due to Him teaching the low caste people there, Isa made his way to Varanasi, then to Nepal and Tibet to study with the Buddhists, devotees of the Ninth Avatar of Vishnu by the tellings of most Hindus.[xlix] 

According to some schools of Hinduism, Gautama Buddha was an Avatar of Vishnu after Vishnu had lived as Krishna.  Thus Jesus’s “Holy Spirit,” i.e., Vishnu as paramatma, had lived as the Buddha and was Jesus’s Divine Mother Mohini, according to this reading.  Again, the Buddhists revere Sastha as synonymous to the Buddha, whereas Hindus figure Aadhi Maha Shasta as identical to the South Indian God Ayyanar and as the monk called Shasta who Rama met in the Sabarimala forest.  I would posit Shasta then manifested as Jeshua/Jesus and as Ayyappa/Manikandan, whose life lived as the son of King Rajashekhara was after the time of Jesus (9th century CE), as seemingly Vishnu/Mohini and Shiva’s Only Son together has lived many lives as various Avatars in fulfilling His dharma as the Protector of Created Beings.  Shiva and Vishnu are not bound by time and space, and thus seemingly did convey Ayyappa to King Rajashekhara millennia after His birth, other incarnations of the Eight Shastas in the interim notwithstanding.  Recall the earlier telling of King Kakudmi and his daughter Revati experiencing time travel.  Indeed, as time itself is not linear, certainly the tales of those who are beyond time and space might not always transpire so as to be read chronologically.

Jesus's aversion to the “legalism” of the brahmins was mirrored in the Gospels by His criticism of the legalism and hypocrisy of the Pharisees and Sadducees, who He certainly saw as analogous to the very much ritually and caste-bound brahmins.  Along those lines it seems as if Jesus, known as Isa whilst in Jagannath, Rajagriha, Varanasi, Nepal and Tibet during His “missing years,”[l] more identified with the teachings of the Buddha, most recent of the Dashavatar (the Ten Avatars of Vishnu), than with those of the orthodox brahmins, though He certainly seems to have been very influenced by the Upanishads, and according to at least one account, took a Hindu guru named Rudraka while abiding in Varanasi.[li]  As noted, according to Buddhists Sastha was an emanation/expression of the Buddha.  The coidentification of Devas and their children and other related Devas is sometimes noted of Hinduism, as Kartikeya and Hanuman are both at times understood as Avatars or at least Emanations of Shiva.

Though often invoking God the Father, Who in this interpretation is Shiva, Jesus who is called Christ seems rather more like the Person of Krishna/Vishnu, God the Maintainer, in many respects, and may have at times been conflated with Vishnu, as Kartikeya with Shiva.  As the Face of Vishnu does sit between the Faces of the Creator and the Destroyer in the Trimurti, so Christianity resides between Judaism and Islam, as Jesus betwixt Abraham/Moses and Mohammad, between the first and last of the Abrahamic religions chronologically, if not symbolically.  As Vishnu's face resides between the faces of Brahma and Shiva in the Trimurti, the Maintainer between the Creator and the Destroyer, Jesus/Shastha is indeed “the man in the middle” betwixt Abraham/Moses and Mohammad, gazing at the Maintainer Krishna (who was Shasta’s Mother Mohini) between the faces of Brahma and Shiva.  

            I have no doubt there are more analogies and historical evidences implying connections between Shasta/Ayyanar/Ayyappa and Jeshua ben Joseph, aka “Jesus Christ,” as well as more evidences that Jesus spent time in India.  This former Southern Baptist preacher is already quite convinced that Jesus was an Avatar of Hindu/Buddhist Aadhi Maha Shasta, the “Only Begotten Son” of Shiva and Vishnu when Vishnu was temporarily a Female, a fertile Transsexual, by having intensely meditated upon the Divine Feminine Shakti, and I must say I am rather quite relieved that this discovery might and ought open Christianity to beyond the sad ailment of exclusivism in any number of respects, and to an honest kinship and genuine unity with the rest of the world and with eternity, Nature and “God,” that Christians might truly learn what it means to “Love thy neighbor as thy Self.”

 

 Swamiye Saranam Ayyappa

AUM Teacher Refuge in Ayyappa



[i] “Shiva, Mohini (Vishnu as a Woman) and Ayyappa,” Karma-Dharma-Bhutadaya, May 10, 2017, http://karma-dharma-bhutadaya.blogspot.com/2017/05/.

[ii] “Shasta (deity),” Wikipedia, last edited July 11, 2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shasta_(deity).

[iii] Ajit Kumar, “Icons of Shasta, Buddha and Ayyappa: Paradigms of Paradoxical Identifications and Sectarian Associations,” Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 7: 2019, Heritage University of Kerala, p. 233, accessed July 11, 2022, https://www.academia.edu/41750088/Icons_of_Shasta_Buddha_and_ Ayyappa_Paradigms_of_Paradoxical _Identifications_and_Sectarian_Associations.

[iv] See Kersey Graves, 346 Striking Analogies Between Christ and Krishna (Whitefish, Montana:  Kessinger Legacy Reprints. Kessinger Publishing, 2010).

[v] “Welcome Home!”  The unofficial Rainbow Family Web Site.  The Rainbow Family of Living Light.  Accessed October 14, 2020.  https://www.welcomehome.org/.

[vi] “Shasta (deity),” Wikipedia, last edited December 10, 2021, accessed June 25, 2022, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shasta_(deity)#:~:text=Shasta%20is%20a%20generic%20Sanskrit,like%20Aiyanar%2C%20Ayyappa%20and%20Revantha.

[vii] Wisdom Library Search the Database: Glossary, Wisdom Library Peace-Love-Dharma, s.v. “isha,” accessed October 21, 2023, https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/isha.

[viii] “Shrines for Sastha, in eight forms,” The Hindu History and Culture, December 5, 2013, https://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/history-and-culture/shrines-for-sastha-in-eight-forms/article5425348.ece?fbclid=IwAR2Zs01FRBIzOo3SzmB8aGgcOOoa6K7o2uX9Jgxl0FEeL7gwt6J-dXGymGw.

[ix] Naveen Sanagala, “Sri Dharma Shasta,” Hindupad, accessed February 21, 2024, https://hindupad.com/dharma-shasta/.

[x] “What you might want to know about Sabarimala,” The Economic Times, October 18, 2018,

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/et-explains/what-you-might-want-to-know-about-sabarimala/articleshow/66273712.cms?from=mdr

[xi] Ulo Valk and S. Lourdusamy, "Village deities of Tamil Nadu in myths and legends: the Narrated Experience," Asian Folklore Studies 66, no. 1-2 (2007): 179+. Gale Academic OneFile, accessed February 22, 2024, https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A172555459/AONE?u=anon~99bd3c8&sid=googleScholar&xid=16b1424e.

[xii] Adrian Russell, “If John was Elijah is Jesus Elisha?” GoThereFor, St Matthias Press Ltd, May 27, 2014, https://gotherefor.com/offer.php?intid=28549&changestore=true.

[xiii] Ibid.

[xiv] Ibid.

[xv] Ibid.

[xvi] Ibid.

[xvii] Ibid.

[xix] Fida Hassnain, A Search for the Historical Jesus (Bath: Gateway Books, 1994), pp.224-6.

[xx] “Rozabal, Srinagar, Kashmir:  Is this the tomb of Jesus Christ?,” A Spiritual Quest…, accessed February 18,  2024, permissions granted February 18, 2024, https://www.mukti4u2.dk/Jesus_Rozabal_Srinagar.htm.  Many thanks to Bodil Poulsen for granting me rights to reproduce this image.

[xxi] Stephen Knapp, “Jesus Predicted in the Vedic Literature?” StephenKnapp.com, accessed October 21, 2022, http://www.stephen-knapp.com/jesus_predicted_in_the_vedic_literature.htm.

[xxii] Ibid.

[xxiii] “Gospel of the Hebrews,” Wikipedia, accessed July 16, 2022, last edited July 14, 2022, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_the_Hebrews.

[xxiv] Cologne Digital Sanskrit Lexicon (from Monier-Williams' 'Sanskrit-English Dictionary'), s.v. “yama,” accessed November 10, 2022 https://www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/scans/csl-santam/php/index.html.

[xxv] Wisdom Library Search the Database: Glossary, Wisdom Library Peace-Love-Dharma, s.v. “Adhi,” accessed October 21, 2023, https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/adhi.

[xxvi] Hassnain, 5-7.

[xxvii] Sri Nagaroo, “Lord Ayyappa.” AUM Sri Nagaroo. 2020 AUM. April 26, 2013, http://srinagaroo.blogspot.com/2013/04/lord-ayyappa.html.

[xxviii] Wisdom Library Search the Database: Glossary, Wisdom Library Peace-Love-Dharma, s.v. “maga,” accessed October 21, 2023, https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/maga.

[xxix] Wisdom Library Search the Database: Glossary, Wisdom Library Peace-Love-Dharma, s.v. “maga,” last updated June 19, 2025, accessed September 2, 2025, https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/maga.

[xxx] Jade Green, “Ayyappa, Muruna and Ganesha,” digital image, Tumblr, https://www.tumblr.com/hinducosmos/56593394100/ayyappan-murugan-and-ganesha

[xxxi] For one of the most comprehensive survey of evidences that indicate Jesus lived in India, and finally died there, see Fida Hassnain, A Search for the Historical Jesus (Bath: Gateway Books, 1994).

[xxxii] Prasad Yashendra, “The Rozabal Shrine of Srinagar.”

[xxxiii] Hassnain, p. 61.

[xxxv] Hassnain, pp. 6-7.

[xxxvi] Ibid.

[xxxvii] “Ishavasya Upanishad with Shankara’s Commentary: Verse 9-18 - The simultaneous practice of Karma and Upāsanā,” Wisdom Library Search the Database: Glossary, Wisdom Library Peace-Love-Dharma, accessed November 2, 2025, https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/ishavasya-upanishad-shankara-bhashya/d/doc143816.html.

[xxxviii] “Vajasaneyi Samhita Upanishad or Isa Upanishad,” translated by Max Müller, Hindu Website, accessed November 2, 2025, https://www.hinduwebsite.com/sacredscripts/hinduism/upanishads/vagasaneyi.asp.

[xxxix] Katha Upanishad, translated by Swami Nikhilananda, Arsha Bodha Center, accessed November 10, 2022, https://arshabodha.org/wp-content/uploads/abc/teachings/Kathopanishad/kathaTrans1.pdf.

[xl] Ibid.

[xli] Ibid.

[xlii] George Wolfe, Parallel Teachings in Hinduism and Christianity (Austin Texas: JOMAR Press, 1995),  accessed via The Cardinal Scholar, https://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/5b8c4540-ca69-48f6-acdb-909b49ea14df/content#:~:text=Jesus%20said%20%22...do,III:36%2C37).

[xliii] Ibid.

[xliv] Ibid.

[xlv] “Significance of Purusha of the size of a thumb,” Wisdom Library Search the Database: Glossary, Wisdom Library Peace-Love-Dharma, last updated 24 September 24, 2024, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.wisdomlib.org/concept/purusha-of-the-size-of-a-thumb.

[xlvi] Ambaa Choate, “Reading the Upanishads: Katha Part Ten,” The White Hindu, Patheos,

last updated March 13, 2015, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.patheos.com/blogs/whitehindu/2014/08/reading-the-upanishads-katha-part-ten/.

[xlvii] George Wolfe, Parallel Teachings in Hinduism and Christianity, pp.5-6.

[xlviii] “Birth & History of Sabarimala Lord Ayyappa,” sabarimalaayyappan.com, SpicyKerala, accessed September 16, 2020, http://www.sabarimalaayyappan.com/lordayyappan.htm.

[xlix] Fida Hassnain, A Search For The Historical Jesus, pp. 63-67.

[l] Ibid.

[li] Prasad Yashendra, “The Rozabal Shrine of Srinagar.”